Kamado Joe Classic II vs Classic III: Charcoal Grill Reviews in 2020
So, you want to purchase the best Kamado style grill for the money, but you aren’t sure which Kamado model will surely serve your needs.
You can use online information, read reviews, visit forums, consult friends, but still, you might end up with overwhelming information that will hinder you from making a comprehensive decision. We’ve noticed that sometimes too much information barely helps, and instead, it overwhelms us, leading to purchase paralysis.
As with many things in life, owning a grill is a personal choice, and what is good for the smoking goose might not necessarily be right for the gander. But from our extensive experience with Kamado grills, we can confidently vouch for both Kamado Joe classic II and Kamado classic III as the best grills in the market this year.
Keep reading as we review and compare Kamado Joe Classic II vs III to help you choose the one that will meet your needs.
The Difference between Kamado Joe Classic II and III
- Our Rating
- Size of 18 inches
Bottom storage: No
sloRoller hyperbolic insert: No
The Charcoal basket divider: Not included
GDPE shelves: plastic coated shelf
Cooking Surface: w/ 2 set of grates : 508 sq. in.
Temperatures between 225F to 750F.
- Our Rating
- Size of 18 inches
Bottom storage: Yes
sloRoller hyperbolic insert: Yes
The Charcoal basket divider: Included
GDPE shelves: aluminum coated shelf
Cooking Surface: w/ 3 Tier Divide & Conquer : 510 sq. in.
Temperatures between 225F to 750F. (500°F Max. when using SlōRoller)
- Grid levels D&C racks – Kamado joe classic II has two racks while classic III grill has three racks.
- The Kamado classic II lacks bottom storage while its counterpart classic III is equipped with bottom storage.
- The sloRoller hyperbolic insert is currently not available in Kamado classic II but its included in the classic III model.
- The Kamado classic II does not come with charcoal basket divider but is made to accommodate should you need to add based on your cooking needs. The charcoal basket divider is included in the Kamado classic III grills.
- The side shelves of Kamado classic II are GDPE plastic coated shelf, while those of classic III are aluminum coated, which are more robust and won’t melt even when something hot is put on them.
Kamado Joe Classic II Vs. Classic III Comparison
Is it Kamado Classic II or Classic III? Perhaps, it’s a question that often lingers in your mind. So in this article, we will compare everything from price, warranty, innovativeness and efficiency in cooking to after-sale services. Without further ado, let’s dive directly into what these two Kamado grills have to offer.
Now we come onto our review of the Kamado Joe Classic II, and here are reliable guides to take you through before hitting the buying button.
- It has a light dome that is attached to the main grill using hinges.
- It is made of aluminum, which makes it rust and mold resistant.
- It has a built-in thermometer that helps regulate temperature.
- It is easy to clean.
- It has two racks so that you can prepare several dishes in several ways at the same time.
- The grill lacks side tables; hence, you will require extra working space.
The Bottom Line
The Kamado Classic II are big green egg alternatives that are well suited for people living mostly in cold areas and are willing to smoke throughout the winter. The dampers, when open, can get blazing hot to sear great steaks. With two-zone cooking, you will take your grilling skills to the next level.
This grill comes with upgraded features that any serious griller will like. With the updated Divide & Conquer Cooking System, the grill has 3 tiers of the split rack, which simply enables you to cook three different meals at different temperatures utilizing varying techniques – all in one cooking.
Another unique feature in Kamado Joe Classic III is the Hyperbolic Smoke Chamber that is useful in increasing smoke circulation for great results.
- It comes with a lifetime warranty.
- It has three racks, which means you can cook three different meals at different temperatures in various styles at the same time.
- It easy to clean and assemble
- It is not portable due to heavy design
- The in-built thermometer isn’t accurate as separate grilling thermometers.
Our Best Selection
Without a doubt, the ceramic barbecue reviews discussed above indicate that both grills are capable of producing delicious meals. However, our primary task was to compare both grills, weigh the benefits and cons of each and select the best grill (of course, our ratings are objective).
If your budget is tight, the Kamado Joe ceramic classic II will save your day. Even with the limited upgrades, this charcoal grill serves it purposefully.
Moreover, if you want the updates, you can have them separately installed in your Kamado Classic II.
The enhancements in the Kamado classic III version are useful to have, but they are not a guarantee of quality barbecue. It doesn’t seem worth the extra dollars.
It is evident that Kamado Joe still leads the market when it comes to sturdy and reliable grills that will last for many years to come. And, while when it comes to Kamado grill comparison, you come down to which size you want, and if you wish to inbuilt of free-standing, these barbecues are all that you need.
From ordinary grilling to high heat searing, baking pizza, low and slow heaters, and even preparing desserts, the Kamado Joe Classic II & Classic III will impress you.